On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 03:22:52PM -0700, Waldo Bastian wrote:
> > I thought we agreed that kdesupport is a convenience module for CVS
> > compilers only and should _not_ be released/packaged?
> 
> That's not the case. I think you missed the message in which I pointed out
> that we need mimelib from kdesupport.

I didn't miss it, but I did not realize that conflicts with the "keep it,
don't package it" idea of David.

It does seem like a waste of resources to package an entire kdesupport just
for the modified mimelib, though. I say:

- put unmodified stuff in kdesupport and don't package it
- put modified stuff elsewhere (mimelib in kdenetwork)

This provides maximum convenience and it allows for kdesupport not to be
packaged.

Rob
-- 
Rob Kaper     | 'What? In riddles?' said Gandalf. 'No! For I was talking
cap@capsi.com | aloud to myself. A habit of the old: they choose the wisest
www.capsi.com | person present to speak to; the long explanations needed by
              | the young are wearying.' - "Lord of the Rings", JRR Tolkien
 
>> Visit http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<