[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Preparing for KDE2.2beta1
From:       Waldo Bastian <bastian () kde ! org>
Date:       2001-06-10 23:56:37
[Download RAW message or body]

On Saturday 09 June 2001 01:43, David Faure wrote:
> On Saturday 09 June 2001 04:29, Michael Matz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Werner Trobin wrote:
> > > <ignorant dumb user>
> > > Why do we have:
> > > B3?
> > > KDE Sgi (vs. Qt Sgi)
> > > System/System++ ? (one of them should be moved out, no?)
> > > Marble (does anyone really use that one?)
> >
> > Yes. Me. Me. Down here, see me?  I use it.
>
> But you would still use it if it was in kdeaddons or kdeartwork ?
> Hmmm .... that's the other question. Should styles go in
> kdeaddons or in kdeartwork ? It's code, but it's artwork too :)
> I can't see any styles in either yet, so the question is open...

I would say kdeartwork. 

Rationale: 
kdeaddons should contain add-on functionality.
kdeartwork should contain extra "make-up".

Styles are, despite that they are coded, make-up and don't provide additional 
functionality.

Cheers,
Waldo
-- 
bastian@kde.org | SuSE Labs KDE Developer | bastian@suse.com
 
>> Visit http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]