[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: QT 3.0 and future KDR Road Map
From:       Christoph Cullmann <crossfire () babylon2k ! de>
Date:       2001-05-23 14:32:40
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2001 16:15 schrieb Bernhard Rosenkraenzer:
> On Wed, 23 May 2001, Neil Stevens wrote:
> > Would a few careful defines (QList->QPtrList) be enough, or are there
> > substantial incompatibilities that a few wrappers couldn't provide?
>
> A couple of changes would be enough.
> Some changes are not exactly trivial though.
>
> I've tried compiling kdelibs with Qt 3.0.0b1 just for fun; some low-level
> classes (most notably dcop stuff) breaks because of constructs like
>
> const QMetaProperty* p = o->metaObject()->property( it.current(), true );
>
> and at least from a quick look, there doesn't seem to be a simple 1:1
> replacement.
>
> A couple of #if QT_VERSION >= 300
>
> constructs should be enough though.
I don't like the idea of having say 2.3 for qt2 or qt3, would only bring 
problems (with software written for kde 2.3 + qt 2 running not on 2.3 + 3 
....)

Why don't make a 2.3 based on completly based on qt 3 ? Would be a nice test 
for qt3 and from 2.3 to 3.0 we only must rework on kde stuff, not rework kde 
and port it to qt3 at once.

cu
Christoph 

>
> LLaP
> bero
>
> >> Visit http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to
> >> unsubscribe <<

-- 

| |   / /               - get an edge in editing -
| | / /                      »»»» GET KATE ««««
| |/ /      a fast and capable multiple document,
|     \     multiple view text editor for KDE
| |\  \     cullmann@kde.org
| |  \  \   http://devel-home.kde.org/~kate

>> Visit http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]