[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: [PATCH] second try at fixing up socklen issues on Solaris
From:       Oswald Buddenhagen <ob6 () inf ! tu-dresden ! de>
Date:       2001-04-05 17:45:01
[Download RAW message or body]

> > don't use any ksize_t or ksocklen_t - that's only unnecessary clutter.
> 
> ?? ksize_t is exactly what you propose socklen_t to be.
>
yep.

> I don't see why that is "unnecessary clutter" since it is already
> there and used in many other places where we had the same problem.
> The name might not be the most suitable but I hope you can see past
> that.
> 
i don't like this inappropriate (misleading) name. it's no problem to 
substitute it everywhere, so i don't see any reason to keep it.
"unnecessary clutter" is putting such an "artificial" name into the
external interfaces. 'int' serves as well, so why bothering people
with another type?

best regards

-- 
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!
--
Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool.
 
>> Visit http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]