On Thursday 29 March 2001 13:18, David Faure wrote:
> On Wednesday 28 March 2001 20:41, Sergio Moretti wrote:
> > On Wednesday 28 March 2001 06:40, Waldo Bastian wrote:
> > > Hiya,
> > >
> > > I especially would like to hear about the status of the following
> > > issues:
> > >
> > > * new kio-slave configuration
> >
> > oops, I was waiting for you, anyway, here the patch for kio
> > directory, plus two file for slave's manager. It compiles, but I
> > haven't tested it, it's more like a draft proposal. I have removed
> > the call to needConfiguration method in slavebase.cpp, as I think
> > it's better to insert it directly in slave code, maybe in
> > constructor. What is left to do is to map KProtocolManager methods
> > to slaveManager, and to move some slave code to new system. If you
> > think that this is the right way, I will try to convince the ftp
> > slave to follow it, and I will make some test.
>
> I'll let Waldo comment on the "right way" issue - I got a bit lost in
> this discussion. But a few minor things in this patch:
> -        KProtocolManager::reparseConfiguration();
> +        //KProtocolManager::reparseConfiguration(); to remove
> No, leave it in ! That's very much needed, and completely unrelated.
>

completely unrelated? but the aim of this work is to substitute 
KProtocolManager

> There are a couple of conflicts in this patch.
>

sorry, I update without give a check, if you want I will repost to you 
a more correct version
 
>> Visit http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<