[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: KPilot's inclusion in 2.1.1?
From:       Adriaan de Groot <adridg () cs ! kun ! nl>
Date:       2001-03-28 21:16:35
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> > [*] Standalone apps don't have this problem since they've got their own
> > configure and everything, while KPilot is part of kdepim and falls under
> > the jurisdiction of the kdepim configure / makefile. That's what's making

> Aehm, you know about cvs2pack, do you? That's the reason why we have
> configure.in.ins

Actually, I don't. And though the developer's checklist is now a fine
starting point for actually getting one's app out the door in an
acceptable state, it doesn't mention cvs2pack either. Can you educate
me? I know it would ease the life of many users and distributors if I
could easily release packaged versions of KPilot ("exotic dependencies" he
says. huh.).

-- 
+------------------------------+
| Adriaan de Groot             | Drinken, in een bepaalde tijd symbolisch,
| http://www.cs.kun.nl/~adridg | is in een andere tijd zuipen - Wittgenstein

 
>> Visit http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]