From kde-devel Thu Mar 08 09:42:13 2001 From: Mathias Waack Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 09:42:13 +0000 To: kde-devel Subject: Re: Dynamic Linking of KDE apps on Solaris X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-devel&m=98404469222826 On Wednesday 07 March 2001 19:24, Michael Matz wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Mathias Waack wrote: > > mathias@homer ldd kde-config | grep libXext > > libXext.so.0 => /usr/lib/libXext.so.0 > > mathias@homer ldd pixie | grep libXext > > libXext.so.6.4 => /opt1/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6.4 > > libXext.so.0 => /usr/lib/libXext.so.0 > > mathias@homer > > > > Why are some programs linked against libXext.so.0, other against > > both libXext.so.6.4 and libXext.so.0 ? > > Do you by any chance suck in libGL and friends (e.g. thru libqt). > This would then link against libXext.so.0. Don't do that, if you > want to link against X11R6 (which seems to be the case here). No, I don't want to link against X11R6, KDE does it by themself. > Also > libqt needs to be built with the same X11 as later KDE will be > built with. There can't be both libraries in one executable. Hmm, the output above tells me that there _are_ both libraries in one executable... > > Is the native libXext.so.0 buggy or misses it some features? > > Openwin is Openwin, and by definition (or history) a crappy piece > of muddy broken shit If I would say this to one my users, her first question will be: why? > (Though, it might work on Solaris 2.8 which I > never tried). It anyway doesn't matter if it misses features or > something, you nevertheless need to be consistent in which version > of X11 you use. Ok, I try to use openwin. Is this possible? How? Or if not, why? Mathias -- Mathias Waack | Mathias.Waack@ti.uni-mannheim.de Tel.: +49 621 181 2717 Fax.: +49 621 181 2713 >> Visit http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<