[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: kdenonbeta question
From:       Stephan Kulow <coolo () kde ! org>
Date:       2001-01-23 11:02:26
[Download RAW message or body]

rik@kde.org wrote:
> 
> #if Bart Szyszka
> > > > Because generally these programs are in an early stage of
> > > > development and not just suitable for inclusion in the main
> > > > release.
> > > so they should be named kde-not-even-beta :)
> > Why don't you guys make it kdeprebeta or something like
> > that to indicate the order? I always think kdenonbeta means
> > *after* beta as in good/stable because beta means bad/unstable.
> > So nonbeta == non-bad/unstable.
> 
> Right. It's a confusing name, and I'm a native English speaker.
> 
> Before I was told, I thought it was apps that were post-beta, whatever
> that might mean.
> 
> Perhaps we can just move the whole tree to another name, or create
> an alias for it and use that from now on ? If there's a way to do
> it without causing major distruption, IMO it should be done.
> 
> I think kde-pre-beta is an appropriate name. NOT kde-alpha.
> 
> Coolo ?
I don't like moving it. I'd say: RTFM, Alex found quite clear words :)

Greetings, Stephan

-- 
It's my true belief that people having wishes for the bug report tool
and report it to the author haven't got the idea behind open source.
                                             anonymous KDE developer
 
>> Visit http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]