[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Bug#17306: KDE 2.0 is a bug itself ...
From:       David van Hoose <david-vh () home ! com>
Date:       2000-12-19 17:23:39
[Download RAW message or body]

Vadim Plessky wrote:
> 
> Monday 18 December 2000 18:54, David van Hoose ???????:
> |
> |   I think what our friend is talking about is the competition between a
> |   lot
> |   of Linux programmers and Micro$oft to see who can release the buggiest
> |   software.
> |   I myself prefer KDE 1.1.2 over KDE 2.0.1 any day of the week. KDE 2 has
> |   problems everywhere that should NOT be in a release. If you want an
> |   example, Konqueror.
> |   Did anyone test it, or is it still in alpha?
> 
> David, you are not correct here.
> KDE2 (under it I understand kdesupport+kdelibs+kdebase) has no *general*
> problems.
> Konqueror doesn't crash for me (while MS IE 5.0, which is ver 5 !! pls. note,
> if is not crashing but *not responding* from time to time)
> And, I can easily run 10 copies of Konqueror on my Linux, while 10 copies of
> IE reduces available resources under Windows 98 to 15%...
> Once, I have seen even Windows Message Box saying:"Can't draw canvas"
> System resources were at 0% (god! and I have 128MB RAM!)
> 
> Konqueror runs well on W3C-compliant sites.
> Yes, many sites are not W3C-compliant, I know. That's why now developers
> trying to get support for them as well.
> And, many non-W3C-compliant sites work correctly with Konqueror now.
> 
> |
> |   > dummies, yet (neither is Windows, frankly said...). You've simply
> |   > chosen an environment you cannot get a hold of. Nobody forces you to
> |   > fly a 747 if all you know how to do is to ride a bike. Freedom of
> |   > choice it is...
> |
> |   Programmers need to test their programs one step at a time so they don't
> |   release a buggy program with the excuse, "It is still in testing." Lame
> |   excuse.
> |   Freedom of choice is good except when all the choices suck.
> 
> IMHO, programs are tested by Beta-Testers, not Programmers.
> And, feel free to test and report bugs about KDE 2.x
> 
> It's really problem when somebody comes and , without filing any bug to
> bugs.kde.org, says: "KDE2 is bad. KDE 2.0 is a bug itself ..."
>  You haven't paid any penny/cent for KDE2, how you can blaim it?!..
> 
> --
> 
> Vadim Plessky

Are you aware that you are sending two of every message to the mailing
list?
This is annoying. Please find out what is wrong.

-- 
-Dave
 
>> Visit http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]