[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: konqueror and gecko
From:       Daniel Borgmann <danny () liebesgedichte ! net>
Date:       2000-10-12 11:11:13
[Download RAW message or body]

> > > but i also work on special programs like realtime chatsystems.
> > > if i make this programs standards compliant, they usually don't work on
> > > half of the browsers :(
> >
> > Perhaps you should use HTML/HTTP for what they were intended for.
> > Whoring out your web browser to make it into some chat thing is an awful
> > hack.  That it works at all scares me.  Even a Java IRC front end is less
> > offensive, and would work just fine with konqy, and avoid your need for
> > mutilated HTML.
>
> <flame>
> Please stop this. Don't start a HTML-flamewar. If Daniel develops
> chatsystems and wants therefore Gecko as KPart, then don't flame him. Yust
> saying: KHTML is much better, you don't need Gecko, and chatsystems are so
> bad, is just small-minded.
> </flame>
>
> IMHO it is a big advantage to have several Engines for Konqueror, people
> will love this -- but most will use KHTML because it's just GREAT :-) But
> HTML-Developers must care about Gecko, and with Gecko as KPart would
> this be simple.

thx, this is exactly what i think! :)
and i wouldn't have send my last mail, if i had read this before, sorry.

Danny
 
>> Visit http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]