[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: KDE2 release schedule update
From:       Mario Weilguni <mweilguni () sime ! com>
Date:       2000-09-26 19:29:27
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Die, 26 Sep 2000 schrieb Waldo Bastian:
(...)
> > - Immediately after the KDE2 v1.0 release a KDE_2_0 branch will be
> > created. Fixes to this branch will be released as KDE2 1.0.X versions
> > soon after the 1.0 release. The KDE_2_0 branch is not open for feature
> > commits.
>
> I don't think branches are a good idea because they tend to be tested very
> poorly. It effectively splits the developers across two branches. We had
> that situation between KDE 1.1.1 and 1.1.2 and only a few (3? 4?) people
> did actually work on 1.1.2.

I dont think it's necessary here to create branches, too. For KDE, a branch 
was necessary, but the architecture of KDE 2.0 should (hopefully) be fairly 
stable and frozen for a while, isn't it?

>> Visit http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]