[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: 1.90 naming [was: Re: arrows issue]
From:       Stephan Kulow <coolo () kde ! org>
Date:       2000-04-30 11:07:19
[Download RAW message or body]

Kurt Granroth wrote:
> 
> tibirna@kde.org wrote:
> > > Random note... it's possibly not a good idea to keep referring to 1.90
> > > as "Krash".  I see that there is already a lot of confusion with
> > > people thinking that *all* devel snapshots are "Krash".. If you, a
> > > core developer, keep referring to 1.90 as Krash, it will probably just
> > > make it *more* confusing.
> > >
> > > However, a name would be nice.  1.90 should be somewhat stable, so
> > > "Krash" wouldn't fit anyway.  Maybe something like Konfucious? (sp)
> >
> > 1.90 Krash
> 
> "Krash" was the name of our so-called 1.89 release back in December.
> Calling 1.90 the same would be... strange.
> 
Ahh! And calling it "Kraft" would be? ;-)

Greetings, Stephan

-- 
It said Windows 95 or better, so in theory Linux should run it
                                                GeorgeH on /.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]