[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: 1.90 naming [was: Re: arrows issue]
From:       Kurt Granroth <granroth () kde ! org>
Date:       2000-04-30 0:58:57
[Download RAW message or body]

tibirna@kde.org wrote:
> > Random note... it's possibly not a good idea to keep referring to 1.90
> > as "Krash".  I see that there is already a lot of confusion with
> > people thinking that *all* devel snapshots are "Krash".. If you, a
> > core developer, keep referring to 1.90 as Krash, it will probably just
> > make it *more* confusing.
> > 
> > However, a name would be nice.  1.90 should be somewhat stable, so
> > "Krash" wouldn't fit anyway.  Maybe something like Konfucious? (sp)
> 
> 1.90 Krash

"Krash" was the name of our so-called 1.89 release back in December.
Calling 1.90 the same would be... strange.

> 1.95 Korner
> 1.99 Kraft
> 2.0  Kopernicus
> 2.1  (mandatory after-final fixes :-) Kepler (or "Son of Kopernic" ?)

-- 
Kurt Granroth            | http://www.granroth.org
KDE Developer/Evangelist | SuSE Labs Open Source Developer
granroth@kde.org         | granroth@suse.com
           KDE -- Putting a Friendly Face on Unix

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]