Thorsten Westheider wrote:
> 
> Stephan Kulow wrote:
> 
> > > > Well, I did the port once long time ago (like 6-7 months) and I even
> > > > commited it. But then it turned out people didn't want it there. Reason?
> > > > Thanks to Martin Jones, KDE-2 supports excellently the native jwz (and
> > > > collab) screensaver hacks. So, it's just a matter of getting the original
> > > > installed.
> > >
> > > Oops? Already committed it, hoping it does not hit a nerve...
> > >
> > Well, in fact it does. Feel free to write to jwz ;)
> > What is the benefit of doubling code if installing xscreensaver gives you
> > even more?
> 
> Uh, come on Stefan, what's KDE specific on the screen savers
> that are already in the repository? I've seen most of them
> when I was running fvwm quite some time ago (and some are still
> as ugly as they were then)...

Yes, that's true. We should remove even more instead of doubling even
more.

Greetings, Stephan

-- 
Programmers, heed this: If someone starts asking you about
agricultural genomes, it's likely time to get a handler. 
                                zdnet.com about Torvalds