[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: RE: Some Inspiration for Konqi Developers
From:       David Faure <david () mandrakesoft ! com>
Date:       2000-03-10 14:25:50
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 09:42:28AM -0500, Lotzi Boloni wrote:
> > A minicli-like solution would enable to do commands that apply
> > on the files shown above (cp/mv/rm/conversions/...) 
> > and see the result in the other views, as opposed to in
> > the standard output. And of course to launch applications.
> > 
> > The konsole solution looks better then (more features), but
> > turning konsole into a part is not that easy I guess... :)
> 
>    I don't think there is any problem with that. Well, the activation
> should be different than other parts, because there is no document type,
> so Browser/View would not make sense here, but besides that I don't see
> any major problems. 

There is a document type. inode/directory, just like konqueror's
dirtree (-> the activation should be fine).

My concern was more about converting konsole to a KParts
app - but on second thought this may be not necessary....
Converting to [qk]actions and possibly to kxmlgui would avoid some
code duplication though (in case konsole publishes any action to konqueror).

Great to see that you consider this too :)

What is the problem with MC and the current directory ?
Doesn't it just 'cd' whereever a particular view (to be defined) goes ?

-- 
David FAURE
david@mandrakesoft.com, faure@kde.org
http://home.clara.net/faure/
KDE, Making The Future of Computing Available Today

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]