[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: KDE, Gnome, Koffice, Goffice and more
From:       Mark Zealey <kde () itsolve ! co ! uk>
Date:       2000-03-01 8:08:47
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Alex Zepeda wrote:

> Perhaps I'm bitter or just overly cynical but I think that the ego issue
> will be a continuing problem.  I'd rather see an open dialog started, as
> we would feel less obligated to adopt something because it's standard.  
> As much as compatibility is an excellent idea, I worry that quality might
> take a back seat to being compatible with an awkward de-facto standard.
> 
> - alex
Yes, I agree. I, personaly think that it's stupid to have two sets of
programmers replicating the same thing, when KDE could be twice as good
as it is allready.

Cheers,

Mark Zealey
mark@itsolve.co.uk

The future's bright, the future's LINUX

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1 
UL+++++$ (GCM/GCS/GS/GM)GUG! dpu? s-:-@ a14! C+++>$ P++$>+++@ L+++>+++++$
!E---? W+++>$ N++@>+ o->+ !K? w++(!---?) !O?@ !M--? !V--? PS- PE--@ Y@
!PGP----? !t---?@ !5---? !X---? !R- tv b+ !DI---? D G e->+++++ h+++*! r++
(www.geekcode.com)
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]