From kde-devel Wed Aug 04 21:48:52 1999 From: Steffen Hansen Date: Wed, 04 Aug 1999 21:48:52 +0000 To: kde-devel Subject: Re: TinyMICO X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-devel&m=93380386320599 On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Dirk A. Mueller wrote: > Matthias Elter wrote: > > >> faster sounds good :) > > "MICO specific" sounds bad. > > If I've understand that right that we're using a C++ binding to CORBA > that is mico specific, one more won't hurt. Actually the C++ mapping is standard, and not MICO specific. There are always some "implementation details" that differ from ORB to ORB -- but they are details. For example, it took only one minute to make the MICO "random.org" example compile with ORBAcus. > Or does that mean that other CORBA apps (i.e. Orbit based) couldn't > talk to our mico apps any more? The "talk to" part is over IIOP, which has nothing to do with the language mapping. As long as they speak the same language on the wire (IIOP), it doesn't matter what mapping and programming language is used for the implementation. -- Steffen Hansen email: stefh@mip.sdu.dk, stefh@imada.sdu.dk, hansen@kde.org URL: http://www.mip.sdu.dk/~stefh