On Wed, 4 Aug 1999, Dirk A. Mueller wrote:

> Matthias Elter <me@main-echo.net> wrote:
> 
> >> faster sounds good :)
> > "MICO specific" sounds bad.
> 
> If I've understand that right that we're using a C++ binding to CORBA
> that is mico specific, one more won't hurt.
> 
> Or does that mean that other CORBA apps (i.e. Orbit based) couldn't
> talk to our mico apps any more?
> 
> then it would be bad. We shouldn't break compatibility.

No problem with this :-)

Bye,
 Simon