Matthias Elter <me@main-echo.net> wrote:

>> faster sounds good :)
> "MICO specific" sounds bad.

If I've understand that right that we're using a C++ binding to CORBA
that is mico specific, one more won't hurt.

Or does that mean that other CORBA apps (i.e. Orbit based) couldn't
talk to our mico apps any more?

then it would be bad. We shouldn't break compatibility.


-- 
Dirk A. Mueller