Steffen Hansen wrote:
> > Steffen, I am pretty sure kdm is much more complete than
> > kcheckpass, but we simply canīt call kdm for unlocking the 
> > screen. :-)
> 
> It's fine with me, but i cant do it right now. Using kcheckpass
> might also be a little weird from kdm, since both kdm and
> kcheckpass will need a connection to the PAM system. Kcheckpass 
> for auth, kdm for PAM session support.

What about putting the functionality in a static library?
We have only one set of files to maintain and kdm can just
include the necassery stuff itself then instead of calling
a different application.

Cheers,
Waldo
-- 
The "gui" in "Penguin" is pronounced "K-D-E"