[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Common server activation
From:       Bavo De Ridder <bavodr () poboxes ! com>
Date:       1999-06-29 16:24:04
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, Waldo Bastian wrote:
>Simon Hausmann wrote:
>[LOTS OF STUFF]
>
>Do I understand the problem correctly by stating that we need:
>
>* A uniform way to find the naming/service cq. trader.
>
>* A uniform way (idl?) to access this service.
>
>* A naming scheme (capabilities scheme?) shared across both 
>  desktops. 
>
>That is then enough for an application to get a reference to
>the required CORBA service object.
>
>The naming server/trader (which one do we preferably use?)
>will need to know which CORBA services exist and how to 
>activate them. If we can't agree on a common scheme for this,
>it should still be possible to support both scheme's right?
>

No decisions to take, all this already exists: CORBA Component Model. Which
Naming Service to use ??? COS Naming Services of course. This is the only
standard-one. There is absolutely no need to reinvent basic things like a
naming service.


BDR

-------------------------------------------------------------
Bavo De Ridder <bavodr@poboxes.com>

PGP Public Key: http://www.poboxes.com/bavodr/public.key.pgp
-------------------------------------------------------------

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]