From kde-devel  Sat Jun 19 23:09:17 1999
From: weis () stud ! uni-frankfurt ! de
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 23:09:17 +0000
To: kde-devel
Subject: Re: Haleluja :-)
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-devel&m=92983270425975

Hi,

On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Dirk A. Mueller wrote:

> weis@stud.uni-frankfurt.de wrote:
> 
> >    1.8MB !!!!!
> 
> > With the real STL I got 2.6 MB and 100kB accont example.
> > The rest of the optimization was done with mini-stl.
> > As you can see STL sucks !!!!!
> 
> Well, unless Kay will provide support in form of #ifdef's in the source
> for the "slim" mico version, it won't help us much.
> 
> I wonder how big a Qt C++ binding would be. Orbit is < 600kb. Are
> we able to code such a binding that is smaller than 1.2MB ?
> 
> If yes, then I suggest coding a C++ binding exactly in the way we
> _need_ it would be a much better solution than trying to slim down
> mico.
> 
> > I am soooooo happy :-)
> 
> Will Kay provide a --enable-KDE-version switch ?
> 
> BTW, is there really no "tiny and slim for basic usage" ORB available?
> I don't know, but I don't believe we need the extended features mico
> provides.

MICO is designed VERY modular. I did not expect it to be
so good. That means: We dont need a feature: Comment it out!

Bye
Torben

> -- 
> Dirk A. Mueller
> 
>