From kde-devel Sat Jun 19 14:44:41 1999 From: Steffen Hansen Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 14:44:41 +0000 To: kde-devel Subject: Re: Haleluja :-) X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-devel&m=92980467108352 On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Sven Radej wrote: > >That's great news! Will we switch to such a tinyMico? > > Er... this means we are kind of forking the tree. Unless Kay provides some > kind of #ifdef TINYMICO or --tiny-mico configure option. > > If we don't use that STL (mini or true) who does then? Mico itself? MICO uses STL a _lot_. This is one of main reasons it's bloated. > As far as I understood there still should be change in IDL to make "Qt-like > source" . Will then (mini) STL still be needed? A version of MICO that uses Q* datastructures will be harder to produce/maintain because a lot of code has to be changed. What Torben did was mostly to "just" remove a lot of code and do "./configure --with-mini-stl". What about the MinimumCORBA spec. people talk about? I think it's intended for embedded solutions and such. greetings, -- Steffen Hansen email: stefh@mip.sdu.dk, stefh@imada.sdu.dk, hansen@kde.org URL: http://www.mip.sdu.dk/~stefh