[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: suffix stuff argument for the idl compiler in am_edit
From:       Simon Hausmann <tronical () gmx ! net>
Date:       1999-06-09 20:26:21
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, David Faure wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 10:02:00PM +0200, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, David Faure wrote:
> > 
> > > > => Do we need these options? Is it safe to remove them, so that both
> > > > mico's can be used? Or is there a workaround available?
> > > 
> > > They control the extension of the generated files, right ?
> > > Can you try without the option and see how the generated files are
> > > named ?
> > 
> > I removed it and everything compiled fine :-)
> > But I guess there's a reason why Stephan added these options, that's why
> > I'm not sure with removing them, I don't want to break anything.
> Well, 2.2.6's idl generates .cc and .h also it seems, even without
> option. So it's ok to remove the option I think.
> 
> But do you want me to ask them why they removed it ?

That would be very nice!!

I'm currently not subscribed to mico-devel because my mail traffic is
already high enough for my slow/expensive connection...

Ciao,
  Simon

--
Simon Hausmann       <hausmann@kde.org>
http://www.kde.org/  <tronical@gmx.net>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]