Simon Hausmann wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, David Faure wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 09:43:51PM +0200, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > > Hi (Stephan :),
> > >
> > > I just switched to new mico 2.2.7 and noticed that the two options
> > > --c++-suffix and --h-suffix (which are both added by am_edit)
> > > "disappeared" from the list of supported aruments of 2.2.7's idl compiler,
> > > thus breaking compilation.
> >
> > Any idea why they removed the options ?
> 
> No idea.
> 
> > > => Do we need these options? Is it safe to remove them, so that both
> > > mico's can be used? Or is there a workaround available?
> >
> > They control the extension of the generated files, right ?
> > Can you try without the option and see how the generated files are
> > named ?
> 
> I removed it and everything compiled fine :-)
> But I guess there's a reason why Stephan added these options, that's why
> I'm not sure with removing them, I don't want to break anything.

Just to be safe. If we can't be safe, we have to be risky ;)

Greetings, Stephan

-- 
Und sie nannten ihn, wie er selbst unterschrieb -
Den Trojanischen Pferdedieb