Martin Konold wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 24 May 1999, Kurt Granroth wrote:
> 
> > Moving KOffice to KDE2 right now was a huge mistake.  If it had remained
> > dependant on 1.1.1 until 2.0 was reasonably stable, then all users would need
> > would be
> >
> > a) mico 2.2.x
> > b) koffice
> >
> > They would already have a working qt and kdelibs!
> >
> > As it is now, KOffice is a very beautiful and powerful and is leagues ahead of
> > any other open source office package... but is also functional vaporware.
> 
> Ok, a partial solution is to make precompile binaries for the major
> distributions available from time to time. Lets call them interim
> releases. The feedback would also be valuable for the KOffice developers.
> 
> Opinions?
> 
For debian this is already in progress (thanks to the good work of
Ivan).
They will named as kdelibs-cvs ... koffice-cvs

Greetings, Stephan

-- 
As long as Linux remains a religion of freeware fanatics,
Microsoft have nothing to worry about.  
                       By Michael Surkan, PC Week Online