On Mon, 3 May 1999, Kurt Granroth wrote:

> David Faure wrote:
> > On Mon, May 03, 1999 at 04:16:03PM +0200, Matthias Elter wrote:
> > > > Well, back to the topic: could we please depend on 2.2.6? I hope,
> > > > that most things can be fixed :) But I would like to have namespaces
> > > > and speedy compilation.
> > > 
> > > Simon told me that David,Torben and he decided to delay the switch because
> > > 1) 2.2.6 breaks the koffice trader,
> > Yes. And the kded trader (which I just committed today) is not ready yet.
> > Steffen, can you take over this code ? I'm much too ignorant about trading
> > (my courses only deal with computer science, not with trading ;)
> > 
> > > 2) they found a bug in 2.2.6.
> > and we reported it to mico-devel. Let's hope they fix it soon.
> 
> What is the nature of the bug?  Is it a "show-stopper"?  In other words,
> if koffice and the trader are all "ported" to 2.2.6, would it be feasible to
> upgrade everything to 2.2.6 or is this bug too major to get by?

The bug breaks compiling koffice.cc . It looks very much like a bug in the
Sequence implementation.
-> It could be fixed "by hand" but then the KOffice Filters would be
broken.


Ciao,
  Simon

--
Simon Hausmann       <hausmann@kde.org>
http://www.kde.org/  <tronical@gmx.net>