[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: HEAD branch
From:       Stephan Kulow <coolo () kde ! org>
Date:       1999-03-12 10:04:58
[Download RAW message or body]

Christian Esken wrote:
> 
> Lars Doelle schrieb:
> >
> > Stephan Kulow wrote:
> >
> > > Christian Esken wrote:
> > > >
> > > > How are your experiences with QT2.0 and the head branch?
> > > >
> > > > Pesonally I enjoy the Mac style, alas only a fraction of programs
> > > > compiles or runs (no kfm, no konsole, no kmail, ...). Is this normal?
> > > >
> > > whole kdebase should compile fine. kmail - well I had a lot
> > > of trouble porting it, so I don't expect too much of it to
> > > work out of the box ;(
> >
> > kdebase compiled fine here, too. Was otherwise disappointing.
> > Virtually every application segfaulted after start.
> 
> Ah, so the beahviour is "normal".
> 
> Coolo, didn't you say we could switch to Qt2.0 quickly,
> as it wouldn't be so unstable?!? Now I see every program
> crashes in some obscure Qt function.
> 
> mit freundlichen Gren,
>   Christian Esken
> 
> Now having to read mails at work, as I have no functional kmail
> at home :-(

Well, I never said that changing to a prebeta toolkit works
as with a full featured toolkit that has already seen three
bugfix releases :)

I always have KDE 1.1 around.

Greetings, Stephan

-- 
As long as Linux remains a religion of freeware fanatics,
Microsoft have nothing to worry about.  
                       By Michael Surkan, PC Week Online

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]