[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: KFMIII or KFMII?
From:       Lars Knoll <knoll () mpi-hd ! mpg ! de>
Date:       1999-02-24 10:53:19
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, 24 Feb 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote:
>On Wed, 24 Feb 1999, David Faure wrote:
>
>> You can disable kfm compilation, but don't remove it now - we need it for
>> converting its code into konqueror.
>
>I know you guys want to keep kfmII in there, I wasn't planing on removing
>it (too much effort... really..), BUT khtmlw which is needed by kdehelp
>and kfmII (and perhaps other apps) is not installed or built by default.
>Or so it seems.  How different are khtml and khtmlw for the "consumer"
>such as kdehelp?
The API is not too different, so porting wouldn't be much work. But khtml is
(like konqueror) work in progress and is (at the moment) not as stable as
khtmlw. So If you wan't kfmII and kdehelp to be stable and usable, we should
perhaps better stick with khtmlw.

Lars

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]