[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-devel
Subject: Re: ftp.kde.org "organization" :)
From: Mario Weilguni <mweilguni () sime ! com>
Date: 1998-07-30 15:49:45
[Download RAW message or body]
Am Wed, 29 Jul 1998 schrieb Kurt Granroth:
>On Tue, Jul 28, 1998 at 10:24:16PM +0200, Kalle Dalheimer wrote:
>> Preston Brown:
>> >I'm not sure I really understand the organization at ftp.kde.org, and that
>> >leads me to believe that others might not either.
>> >
>> >there are applications under /pub/kde/stable/1.0/apps/... that aren't
>> >shipped in the main kde packages. What determines what goes in here?
>> >
>> >similarly, what goes in /pub/kde/stable/1.0/contrib?
>> >
>> >what determines whether something goes into /pub/kde/stable/1.0/apps vs.
>> >/pub/kde/unstable/apps?
>>
>> The authors themselves either declare their apps stable or they don't.
>
>The question then becomes: "what is stable?"
>
>I saw or read somewhere not too long ago that in order for a developer to
>consider their app stable enough for the stable tree, it only had to
>compile flawlessly. I thought that this was a very curious statement.
>Who would upload a package that *didn't* compile? So does that make
>all apps 'stable?'
>
>Personally, I didn't consider KBiff "stable" until I stopped adding
>features. My definition of "stable", then, seems to be "non-changing"
>(except for bug fixes).
Your definition is a little bit heavy to fulfill. That is what version numbers
are for.
Mario
>--
>Kurt Granroth
>granroth@kde.org
>http://www.pobox.com/~kurt_granroth
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"Why use Windows if we have doors?"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mario Weilguni Email: mweilguni@sime.com
A-8051 Graz/Austria Phone: +43-316-68-56-45
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic