weis@stud.uni-frankfurt.de wrote:

Hi,
this is indeed ugly. gcc STL uses remove and egcs STL uses erase.
Which is one is the standard now ?
... puzzled ...
Bye
Torben

According to Josuttis: "Die C++-Standardbibliothek", Addison-Wesley-Longman 1996 it is "remove".
But of course we have to deal with both of them. In kab, I simply declare a macro ERASE and set it to one of them. The methods "erase" and "remove" have, AFAIK, the same functionality. That is why I asked for a automake define to have a global distinction between both STL versions.
Greetings,
--Mirko.

-- 
http://www.hamburg.netsurf.de/~mirko.sucker/
Die besten sind diejenigen, die alles selbst bedenken; gut sind auch die,
die auf den Rat Erfahrener hoeren; diejenigen aber, die weder wissen noch
hoeren auf anderer Weisheit sind nutzlose Wichte. --Hesiod (8. Jhd. v.C.)