From kde-devel  Fri Dec 01 12:59:22 2023
From: AnnoyingRains <annoyingrain5 () gmail ! com>
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 12:59:22 +0000
To: kde-devel
Subject: Re: Interest in building an LLM frontend for KDE
Message-Id: <CALYH9HYugtMz3uDwxL8sT1m-CRbKWNnXb-zkr2t9UBiA2OEgYw () mail ! gmail ! com>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-devel&m=170143558926338

I see no issue with this at all!
As long as the training data is ethically obtained and it uses KDE's
tech stack, I feel like this app could integrate fine, if it is as you
have described it so far!

- Kye Potter


On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 11:41=E2=80=AFPM Loren Burkholder
<computersemiexpert@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> > I don't think so. I have the slight feeling that you want to start an a=
bstract
> > discussion here and then magically the "KDE Community" will develop som=
ething.
> > Just do it or don't. It will always be in the users freedom to use it o=
r not.
> > I would love to have an optional KMail plugin that interacts with an LL=
M.
> > Others might not =F0=9F=A4=B7=F0=9F=8F=BB=E2=80=8D=E2=99=82
> >
> I'm definitely not trying to get the KDE community to develop something f=
or me. As I said earlier, I am starting this discussion solely because I am=
 aware that AI is a very sensitive topic and I wanted to make sure that the=
re was reasonable support before I just kicked off development.
>
> With that being said, I appreciate your take. KDE does support clients fo=
r various nonfree services (e.g. KMail has support for Microsoft Exchange);=
 while KDE obviously don't promote them, it understands that many people do=
 use them, and it's worthwhile to provide support for those people.
>
> Loren