[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: KDE Gear Qt6 CI that don't pass
From:       Ben Cooksley <bcooksley () kde ! org>
Date:       2023-03-02 6:20:26
Message-ID: CA+XidOFXFj8rQFBPJ+JqApkf5gYgTUjnXYJNQFN1krN8XyB5oQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 12:21 PM Albert Astals Cid <aacid@kde.org> wrote:

> These projects have Qt6 CI that don't pass.
>
> I'll remove the Qt6 CIs on Sunday unless they are fixed.
>
> kdialog
> spectacle
> dragon
> kpat
> kio-gdrive
> markdownpart
> zanshin
> kalendar
>
> Cheers,
>   Albert
>
> P.S: Maybe some other pim stuff is broken too, most of the PIM things are
> not
> passing at all in CI so :shrug:
>

I've not had the time as of late to take a look at the status of CI
however it would appear that PIM has gotten itself into an incredibly bad
state as a result of Qt 6 porting work that was prematurely jumped on and
which was not intended at all for anyone outside of Frameworks to be using
at the time. *Sigh*

I shall take a look at this when I next get the chance to rectify anything
that is the fault of the CI system itself.

It would be good if the PIM developers took a solid look at their code and
made sure it actually all builds against each other before I get to it so I
only have things that are the CI system's fault to fix.

Regards,
Ben

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 12:21 PM Albert Astals Cid \
&lt;<a href="mailto:aacid@kde.org">aacid@kde.org</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><div \
class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px \
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">These projects have \
Qt6 CI that don&#39;t pass.<br> <br>
I&#39;ll remove the Qt6 CIs on Sunday unless they are fixed.<br>
<br>
kdialog<br>
spectacle<br>
dragon<br>
kpat<br>
kio-gdrive<br>
markdownpart<br>
zanshin<br>
kalendar<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
   Albert<br>
<br>
P.S: Maybe some other pim stuff is broken too, most of the PIM things are not <br>
passing at all in CI so :shrug:<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I&#39;ve not had \
the time as of late to take a look at the status of CI however  it would appear that \
PIM has gotten itself into an incredibly bad state as a result of Qt 6 porting work \
that was prematurely jumped on and which was not intended at all for anyone outside \
of Frameworks to be using at the time. *Sigh*</div><div><br></div><div>I shall take a \
look at this when I next get the chance to rectify anything that is the fault of the \
CI system itself.</div><div><br></div><div>It would be good if the PIM developers \
took a solid look at their code and made sure it actually all builds against each \
other before I get to it so I only have things that are the CI system&#39;s fault to \
fix.</div><div><br></div><div>Regards,</div><div>Ben</div></div></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]