El jue, 6 ene 2022 a la(s) 14:20, Sandro Knau=C3=9F (sknauss@kde.org) escri=
bi=C3=B3:
>
> Sorry, that follow the side discussion, that has not connected to the
> translation problem in first place.
>
> > yes, the aim is to have 2 distinct sets for the pedagogical point of vi=
ew,
> > it's a bit more complicated.
>
> Me personally is not and was never ok with the gender the society gave me=
. And
> I fight hard against the binary gender thinking everywhere. And I'm very =
happy
> that we finally have a third Gender option for official documents in Germ=
any
> called non-binary (German: Divers). Today I had some with public authorit=
ies
> about something else, but they were aware of this and didn't put me
> automatically into the binary gender box. I was very amazed.
>
> And than I read about this thread, that a program that is made for kids i=
s
> teaching them the binary gender system and are telling me that is a good =
thing
> from a pedagogical point of view: Sorry NO! This is discriminating and ma=
king
> it less likely that we will overcome with the discrimination.
>
> I know it is hard but we should find a separation attribute, that is not
> discriminating e.g. color of cloths.

There is a time and place to teach kids about the complexity of gender
and I don't think an exercise about arithmetic/counting is the right
place.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lie-to-children

--=20
Nicol=C3=A1s