On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Percy Camilo Triveño Aucahuasi <percy.camilo.ta@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Aleix Pol <aleixpol@kde.org> wrote:

On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Jeremy Whiting <jpwhiting@kde.org> wrote:

Aleix, All,

In looking at what needs to be done to prepare libkdeedu for porting
to kf5 and qt5 and what needs doing to split (or maybe just repurpose
it as libkeduvocdocument + data ?) as per
http://community.kde.org/KDEEdu/RouteToKF5 I took a look at the icons
folder.

The users of the icons there are mostly kmplot, but also analitza.  My
question is where should these icons go? Can/should we move them into
some general purpose icons repository (kde-artwork or something?) or
should they move into analitza git repo (only if kmplot depends on
analitza already I think). Or somewhere else entirely?

Thanks,
Jeremy

Hi,

kmplot doesn't use analitza and never will, what we are proposing is khipu, a new project, as a replacement.

That said, I'd say the best could be to get a kde-math-icons repository or similar? Is there another case of a repository with only icons? Maybe oxygen? (even though the icons are not oxygen per se...)
Anybody has an opinion?

Aleix

PS: Adding kde-devel because I can see this happening on other modules as well and I think we want a way do decide these things.

We could move those artifacts into something like libkdeedu-math-data or as Aleix said: kde-math-icons. In any case, I think a dedicated repository for this kind of content (related with kde math applications) is a good idea.

Percy

It still sounds quite weird that we have a repo for all artwork in KDE except for some and then one with the mathematical icons as if they were something that special.