From kde-devel  Wed May 21 22:15:09 2014
From: Lindsay Mathieson <lindsay.mathieson () gmail ! com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 22:15:09 +0000
To: kde-devel
Subject: Re: Is there still a need for a baloo gif file indexer?
Message-Id: <2928195.Q5i8gpdad9 () lindsay-office>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-devel&m=140071057500666
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============1530163489865801909=="


--===============1530163489865801909==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart18680096.T0IcY8zF0q"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"


--nextPart18680096.T0IcY8zF0q
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

On Wed, 21 May 2014 01:42:18 PM Vishesh Handa wrote:
> Nope. But I think the exif one should be able to handle it. I'm not s=
ure if=20
> there is anything apart from the width and height that needs to be
> extracted.

Ya, for some reason I thought gifs could have arbitrary tags, but that =
doesn't=20
seem to be the case.

>=20
> Care to patch it up?

I'll take a look.

=2D-=20
Lindsay
--nextPart18680096.T0IcY8zF0q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAlN9JW0ACgkQNbLM9wS4sYcxpwCfQaVTacYYWIIKJNEMYHMDruwZ
tw4AoJulzWjwy1t1OnhAA5nG7Xzd+n3W
=vULP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart18680096.T0IcY8zF0q--


--===============1530163489865801909==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline


>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

--===============1530163489865801909==--