--===============6616466300085871700== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2437cbf2e7504f7cb33dd --001a11c2437cbf2e7504f7cb33dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi folks! Each of us keep an idea about our target users when we write KDE software, be it our workspaces, our applications or anything. From recent threads on the list, I have started doubting if the ideas I have in mind have been correct or not all the years I've been in KDE. So, I started asking myself about what my answer would be to "of all users of KDE software, what type of users are the majority?". ** When I look at a desktop[1] computer users today, I categorize them[2] as- == Casual users == These users primarily want their computer to do a set of tasks, and do it as soon as possible. Whatever it takes, they *try* to spend the least time on the computer. == Advanced users == These users are similar to casual ones in the sense that they want their work done as soon as possible. However, they go the extra mile to figure out ways in which they can optimize their workflow or use some software cleverly. This way they are actually able to get more done. == Power users == These users generally use their computer for a even broader set of tasks and will try to solve each and every real world problem using software on their computers. Something that is very important for such users is the software to be highly customizable to suit their style of working. They will juice out each and every feature of the software to get the maximum benefit they can. Time is usually less of a problem for these folks, however they are also very picky about choosing a software that meets their needs. == Students, employees on their company-provided computers == This category will actually have users from all of the above. However, there is a difference in the sense that they will not be the ones making the choice on what OS they will be using. The choice will usually be made for them by their schools, and companies respectively. ** Now, given the above set of users, going by only my observation and experience, the Operating System choice looks something like this- == Casual users == most of them will use Windows as it still is the most popular among similar people, some of them will use OSX - mostly people who can afford an Apple computer == Advanced users == The number of people using Windows will be a bit higher than the number of people using OSX, followed by a small fraction using a Linux distribution == Power users == There will be some Windows users who install lot of tweaking tools, and quite some OSX users with the same pattern. However, most of these users will be using a Linux distribution (or BSD etc) with a choice of a desktop environment, email client etc) because they find the ease of customization and the feeling of control of the whole system. Now, just in Power users, there will be a huge variety of distros and DEs that people will choose. When I think about DEs, (again this is only from experience and blog posts on the Internet) people who choose KDE do that because we offer *lots* of features and the maximum level of customization when compared to any other DEs. So, that was my attempt at recollecting my thoughts from the last few days. I'll love to hear what you guys think about it - is it close to the reality? Or, did I get it all wrong? Or, there's just no way to be even remotely sure? This it will help me a lot as a KDE contributor, to make sure the software I write is a delight to our users. [1] and laptops, netbooks etc, excluding mobile devices though [2] and I am no usability expert as well, so I can be wrong about user profiles Cheers! -- Shantanu Tushar (UTC +0530) http://www.shantanutushar.com --001a11c2437cbf2e7504f7cb33dd Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi folks!

Each of us keep= an idea about our target users when we write KDE software, be it our works= paces, our applications or anything. From recent threads on the list, I hav= e started doubting if the ideas I have in mind have been correct or not all= the years I've been in KDE. So, I started asking myself about what my = answer would be to "of all users of KDE software, what type of users a= re the majority?".

** When I look at a desktop[1] computer users today, I categorize= them[2] as-

=3D=3D Casual users =3D=3D
These users pr= imarily want their computer to do a set of tasks, and do it as soon as poss= ible. Whatever it takes, they *try* to spend the least time on the computer= .

=3D=3D Advanced users =3D=3D
These users are similar to casual ones = in the sense that they want their work done as soon as possible. However, t= hey go the extra mile to figure out ways in which they can optimize their w= orkflow or use some software cleverly. This way they are actually able to g= et more done.

=3D=3D Power users =3D=3D
These users generally use their computer f= or a even broader set of tasks and will try to solve each and every real wo= rld problem using software on their computers. Something that is very impor= tant for such users is the software to be highly customizable to suit their= style of working. They will juice out each and every feature of the softwa= re to get the maximum benefit they can. Time is usually less of a problem f= or these folks, however they are also very picky about choosing a software = that meets their needs.

=3D=3D Students, employees on their company-provided computers =3D=3DThis category will actually have users from all of the above. However, th= ere is a difference in the sense that they will not be the ones making the = choice on what OS they will be using. The choice will usually be made for t= hem by their schools, and companies respectively.

** Now, given the above set of users, going by only my observation and e= xperience, the Operating System choice looks something like this-

=3D=3D= Casual users =3D=3D
most of them will use Windows as it still is the mo= st popular among similar people, some of them will use OSX - mostly people = who can afford an Apple computer
=3D=3D Advanced users =3D=3D
The number of people using Windows wil= l be a bit higher than the number of people using OSX, followed by a small = fraction using a Linux distribution

=3D=3D Power users =3D=3D
The= re will be some Windows users who install lot of tweaking tools, and quite = some OSX users with the same pattern. However, most of these users will be = using a Linux distribution (or BSD etc) with a choice of a desktop environm= ent, email client etc) because they find the ease of customization and the = feeling of control of the whole system.

Now, just in Power users, there will be a huge variety of distros a= nd DEs that people will choose. When I think about DEs, (again this is only= from experience and blog posts on the Internet) people who choose KDE do t= hat because we offer *lots* of features and the maximum level of customizat= ion when compared to any other DEs.


So, that was my attempt at recollecting my thoughts from the las= t few days. I'll love to hear what you guys think about it - is it clos= e to the reality? Or, did I get it all wrong? Or, there's just no way t= o be even remotely sure? This it will help me a lot as a KDE contributor, t= o make sure the software I write is a delight to our users.

[1] and laptops, netbooks etc, excluding mobile devices though
[2] and I am no usability expert as well, so I can be wrong abo= ut user profiles

Cheers!

--
Shantanu Tushar=C2=A0 =C2=A0 (UTC +0530)
http://www.shantanutus= har.com
--001a11c2437cbf2e7504f7cb33dd-- --===============6616466300085871700== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe << --===============6616466300085871700==--