[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Disabling baloo-integration possible?
From:       mk-lists () email ! de
Date:       2014-04-09 22:12:55
Message-ID: 37574FAD-2A22-4101-B0FF-56845A2EF0C1 () email ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi again,

On 09 Apr 2014, at 23:53 , Frank Reininghaus <frank78ac@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I think that there are many KDE apps which do not require Baloo at all.
I could imagine that too.

> I'm not sure if there is a full list somewhere, but you can
> always build KDE modules and watch for any Baloo-related output from
> CMake. If there is none, then everything will most likely work fine
> without Baloo.
OK, perhaps we could think about introducing baloo as an opt-in port variant which \
would only be installed if the user specifically asks for it. But that - of course - \
could cause a lot of stress during port maintenance.

I guess it is better to install baloo and simply disable it. This case should be \
handled safely by all baloo-dependent KDE applications.

Greets,
Marko

> > Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]