This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============0692240891678970373==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="nextPart2212841.rPvs4kL1Qv"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--nextPart2212841.rPvs4kL1Qv
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
I did help, and a lot! While you didn=E2=80=99t explain why the newConn=
ection() signal is emitted twice, you gave me a way to avoid counting t=
he same request more than once, which is far better. I can now continue=
working on the tests.
I=E2=80=99ve posted the issue in the Qt Forums[1], to see if someone th=
ere has more input on why QTcpServer behaves the way it behaves.
Again, many thanks.
Adrian
O Xoves, 7 de Marzo de 2013 15:31:31 Albert Astals Cid escribiu:
> El Dimarts, 5 de mar=C3=A7 de 2013, a les 21:25:13, Adri=C3=A1n Chave=
s Fern=C3=A1ndez va=20
> escriure:
> There's no race condition at all between KJob and QNetworkAccessManag=
er, i'd=20
> say it's just that your code is assuming wrong stuff regarding how th=
e network=20
> communication happens.
>=20
> Proof that there is no KJob/QNetworkAccessManager race condition is a=
ttached=20
> in proof1.tar.bz2. As you can see in it, there is no KJob anywhere bu=
t you=20
> still get "Already got this request!!!!!!!!!!!" debugs
>=20
> Proof that there is something wrong in your assumptions on how the ne=
twork=20
> communication happens is attached in proof2.tar.bz2. As you see there=
I'm not=20
> sending any data in the post method and all is fine. (You can do the =
same in=20
> your code by sending nothing in your post() method inside job.cpp)
>=20
> Hope this helps.
>=20
> Cheers,
> Albert
--------
[1] http://qt-project.org/forums/viewthread/25521/
--nextPart2212841.rPvs4kL1Qv
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
I d=
id help, and a lot! While you didn=E2=80=99t explain why the newConnect=
ion() signal is emitted twice, you gave me a way to avoid counting the =
same request more than once, which is far better. I can now continue wo=
rking on the tests.
I=E2=
=80=99ve posted the iss=
ue in the Qt Forums, to see if someone there has more input =
on why QTcpServer behaves the way it behaves.
Aga=
in, many thanks.
Adr=
ian
O X=
oves, 7 de Marzo de 2013 15:31:31 Albert Astals Cid escribiu:
>=
; El Dimarts, 5 de mar=C3=A7 de 2013, a les 21:25:13, Adri=C3=A1n Chave=
s Fern=C3=A1ndez va
>=
; escriure:
>=
; There's no race condition at all between KJob and QNetworkAccessManag=
er, i'd
>=
; say it's just that your code is assuming wrong stuff regarding how th=
e network
>=
; communication happens.
>=
;
>=
; Proof that there is no KJob/QNetworkAccessManager race condition is a=
ttached
>=
; in proof1.tar.bz2. As you can see in it, there is no KJob anywhere bu=
t you
>=
; still get "Already got this request!!!!!!!!!!!" debugs
>=
;
>=
; Proof that there is something wrong in your assumptions on how the ne=
twork
>=
; communication happens is attached in proof2.tar.bz2. As you see there=
I'm not
>=
; sending any data in the post method and all is fine. (You can do the =
same in
>=
; your code by sending nothing in your post() method inside job.cpp)
>=
;
>=
; Hope this helps.
>=
;
>=
; Cheers,
>=
; Albert
--nextPart2212841.rPvs4kL1Qv--
--===============0692240891678970373==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
--===============0692240891678970373==--