[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Build KMail only?
From:       Matthias Fuchs <mat69 () gmx ! net>
Date:       2011-07-11 9:05:20
Message-ID: 3115567.9EYigIB9dN () matthias-desktop
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Montag 11 Juli 2011, 08:47:47 schrieb Tom Albers:
> ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
> 
> > Am Montag 11 Juli 2011, 10:25:16 schrieb Matthias Fuchs:
> > > I am running KMail2 and here it is worse in _every_ aspect than
> > > KMail1.
> > 
> > Ok, that was very unfair. There are things KMail2 is better here than
> > KMail1.
> > A lot of these have to do with the additional integration.
> > 
> > So there is a lot of promise what the whole stack can be in the
> > future, imo it
> > just does not live up to it yet.
> 
> Can I also remind everyone at the severe 'kmail-ate-my-mails' from the
> KMail1 days? There have been numerous reports that KMail ate mails in
> certain circumstance. Offline IMAP could potentially corrupt data when
> hitting check-mail at the wrong time, etc. Let's not remember KMail1 as
> being heaven. It was certainly not.
> 
> To address those issues KMail2 was created, that it is not (yet) fully
> working is a fact, but don't say KMail1 always worked nicely, if that would
> have been the case, it would not have been rewritten.
> 
> Best,

Well I know that KMail2 was created to fix many issues, though I only use POP3 
and SMTP so I was never hit by the IMAP issues of which there were some quite 
serious as you point out.

Yet indeed I have no clue what the original poster uses.
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]