[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Moving the KGameRenderer framework to pseudo-kdereview
From:       Miha Čančula <miha.cancula () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-07-01 17:40:10
Message-ID: AANLkTimAWo8unLyoscGD8SL67nZywQYtKRJpW2bZgC3j () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


Ok, I went ahead and ported the chess game I'm writing to KGameRenderer. A
chess game with only basic (position-based) animation is not a useful
benchmark, but it only required some small changes to the code and seems to
work well enough. It also isn't a proper review, because I only used the
Item without any transformations or animations.

If I can make a suggestion (I'm late, I know...) I would export all
QGraphicsItem's properties, not only "frame". At least "pos" is useful for
animation and to avoid repeating code, as I see you had to add the
declaration in KDiamond as well.

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

Ok, I went ahead and ported the chess game I&#39;m writing to KGameRenderer=
. A chess game with only basic (position-based) animation is not a useful b=
enchmark, but it only required some small changes to the code and seems to =
work well enough. It also isn&#39;t a proper review, because I only used th=
e Item without any transformations or animations. <br>
<br>If I can make a suggestion (I&#39;m late, I know...) I would export all=
 QGraphicsItem&#39;s properties, not only &quot;frame&quot;. At least &quot=
;pos&quot; is useful for animation and to avoid repeating code, as I see yo=
u had to add the declaration in KDiamond as well. <br>



>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]