[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Upstream bugs... (Qt)
From:       Andreas Pakulat <apaku () gmx ! de>
Date:       2009-11-26 15:23:15
Message-ID: 20091126152315.GE10553 () neo ! apaku ! dnsalias ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On 26.11.09 15:39:02, Alexis Ménard wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Since Qt Development Frameworks have an open bug tracker i would like to
> invite people to report bugs into it.
> 
> As you can see in this bug (https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210146),
> it's marked as CLOSED UPSTREAM. But if nobody reports the bug in Qt's
> bugtracker, there is no way for Qt developers to know that the bug exists (i
> knew it because i'm following Plasma). Right now filtering by
> closed/upstream gives Trolls nothing since there is not enough information.
> I'm sure there are some other bugs that need a proper report.
> 
> So if you marked the bug CLOSED UPSTREAM please create one in the Qt
> bugtracker and link it into the KDE bugtracker so people can follow it.

I'd like to know what the general opinion about the following is:

Somebody reports a bug in kdevelop, I'm triaging the bug and can't
reproduce it. From the backtrace its relatively clear that its most
probably a bug in Qt.

The question now is: Who should report it to Qt? Me or the original
reporter who can reproduce the problem?

Andreas

-- 
This will be a memorable month -- no matter how hard you try to forget it.
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]