[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Best license to use for example code? (was: Re:
From:       Stefan Majewsky <majewsky () gmx ! net>
Date:       2009-09-27 21:51:46
Message-ID: 200909272351.49874.majewsky () gmx ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


Am Sonntag 27 September 2009 23:43:32 schrieb Friedrich W. H. Kossebau:
> What license is best used for simple example code snippets?
> I tend to say "In public domain". Is there some example license text for
>  this (TechBase seems to only have non-public-domain ones)?
> 
> And what about all the example code on TechBase? Is it under the FDL? And
>  what does that mean for people using the snippets in their own code?
> 
> Maybe nitpicking, but some examples can be more complicated, so worth a
> license...

Incidentally, I had the same problem right today (see 
trunk/playground/games/palapeli/libpala-example). I have chosen the MIT 
license, a very liberal BSD-style license.

Greetings
Stefan

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]