--===============1318542291== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1531777.nY7pQslDDW"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart1531777.nY7pQslDDW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 06 July 2009 17:01:02 Gary Greene wrote: > On 7/6/09 4:41 PM, "Sven Burmeister" wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 1. Juli 2009 17:15:01 schrieb Daniel Winter: > >> 2009/7/1 Josh Berry : > >>> IMO there is no excuse for having promulgated this DOS-era mistake > >>> (shortcut?) for as long as we have. I understand the technical > >>> reasons for using binary units internally, but presenting them as if > >>> they were SI units has only contributed to the type of confusion that > >>> spawned this thread. > >> > >> Another addition: > >> > >> We (KDE) are not the only one who made the transition to correct use of > >> units. > >> > >> There are quite a few other FOSS applications (GUI as CLI tools) which > >> are showing Ki/Mi and so on. > > > > Indeed. The other day I noticed that e.g. zypper also shows them like > > that. So KDE is in the starter group of adopting the correct units and > > not isolated. > > > > Sven > > > >>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to > >>> unsubscribe << > > That may be the case, but those on Windows and Mac will see TWO SETS OF > UNITS! This becomes a problem for them since end users will see from > Explorer or Finder KB as the unit with base 2 units and only in KDE > applications KiB. The response from end users isn't going to be "Oh, I'll > look that up on the net" but rather, "These guys don't know what normal > units are for computers." > > I hate to say it, but until the proprietary OS vendors move over, this > shouldn't be the default in KDE since our target audience isn't the ones = in > the know, but rather the ones that will question us for what they perceive > as incorrect behaviour. Remember, soup boxes don't sell software, > pragmatism does. And why would they _want_ to. It's the proprietary systems (hard=20 disk vendors, OS vendors) who started this mess. They aren't going to fix i= t if=20 (and since) it helps the disk vendors make money. --nextPart1531777.nY7pQslDDW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCAAGBQJKU6dkAAoJEPZx0bYnzB66pqwP/0BAM9dSBdjLJJcAP74zB/S4 ULrbI45OJtUwa1IWYjCsXR8fTG4yXH3u4o+opqLVJBS0hvAstniG12UYn98pbFTY cQ1gTqooGHcvI2DC+OunDQy56EflP4beW0Oo1+mTTiJ0sUqkSYxuGzHtiRsdB8XG CN6po2Ux5rYTOxQqaGTcLKab647KuF25fGQfo6Nd6MFmIsjUebIaMEeWoYEepwwn V2BYkorSiJRcCzAy3ze0yo5PXQgtOSUCCVyVCa1mmLPv7ktGHsxA6tedu4cZ4siy 4KoH3cUmSupz7jW5KvqwMpJBFy4mX672g8Hg4DpeNo83Ce3vOCASaXiF4LEID42M y0wIoreWLXCiU982bsersLZPwUcH7tULqN0ioo++ZVSvZLWD7zN8xL+574cmkOaX zc6I9ir3Z8+Z8udv3qs2PFPlrXke9mZbr6yCF5tn9l1GH9PHePmhZSwJbbyrtgRO 8wXWtkBi5nFNuxpEdK1KKL5Skr58oAF8kNonooz7yMM+J3bjjHU5Suk5pdzAsldQ fRPWgoFYvIGPjEwgNJ0S6tcJaecMdTQKFW+RJ+6fJ+xMioF6y/oS6D0qcMNh0LSS y+QjZT+9anTszubhvd6ZtsxrEpURaGW68erCSHv+CUGjoGSEY7wDVoiWbJK2CnXU i+z3woLpnbcRnfwVJnnC =a/0a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1531777.nY7pQslDDW-- --===============1318542291== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe << --===============1318542291==--