From kde-devel  Mon Jun 29 19:32:19 2009
From: Arnold Krille <kde () arnoldarts ! de>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:32:19 +0000
To: kde-devel
Subject: Re: zeitgeist for KDE
Message-Id: <200906292132.20154.kde () arnoldarts ! de>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-devel&m=124630404730652
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============1691118009=="

--===============1691118009==
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart20110214.mX3vX1Jali";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart20110214.mX3vX1Jali
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Monday 29 June 2009 19:45:29 Sebastian K=FCgler wrote:
> On Monday 29 June 2009 14:55:27 Shane Fagan wrote:
> > I like Kronometer
> > > > 	Kronolith? :)
> > > Kronometer?
> Can we just *not* use a clunky (klunky!?) k-name? We've been slowly moving
> away from those names all over the place. I think just using the "c" name
> would work as well. (Not that I checked possible trademark problems of bo=
th
> options.)

I don't really think that any judge would rules "chronometer" as a valid=20
trademark. Otherwise I would register "clock" as a trademark. :-)

I would be fine with the ch-variant too.

Arnold


--nextPart20110214.mX3vX1Jali
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkpJFsQACgkQuYLL1cDjHx0GdwCeN0e02E011opjjAzxvr95Oek2
4joAnikwQ9i4HDwRLGKRQv67ODg3X8Nr
=inhL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart20110214.mX3vX1Jali--

--===============1691118009==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

--===============1691118009==--