[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Some thoughts and brainstorming about DrKonqui crash handler
From:       Darío Andrés <andresbajotierra () gmail ! com>
Date:       2009-01-24 14:00:33
Message-ID: a2c126ef0901240600r26834b36v352a37327366d273 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Bad bug number: I meant bug 174078 : http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174078

On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Darío Andrés
<andresbajotierra@gmail.com> wrote:
> - We need to avoid messes like http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167473
> I suppose this is because the report title is the same as the KCrash
> handler title. (App (appexec) crashed and caused the signal X
> (SIGNAME). )
> So anyone reporting an "App" crash will post in there , but the
> backtraces, the causes and the crash itself are completely different.
> We should encourage the user to choose an unique title for the report
> or (probably better) to look the backtrace he got and the backtrace
> posted and *compare* them, so  if they are a lot different he needs to
> file a new bug report
>
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic