On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 08:18:22AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Right, so surely you just need to fix Archlinux to have the binary
> builds available? People like Suzy and Graham [1] are not going to
> understand what compiling is or how to fix it when it goes wrong, and
> Bevan isn't going to want to spend time doing it -- after all he doesn't
> have to do it on Fedora or Ubuntu.

Excuse my butting in, but I think you missed the point that Shaman isn't
PackageKit, and doesn't cater to the same audience =)
If I've gotten it correctly, it's more for the "power"-users who don't
necessarily know a lot about Linux or packaging in particular, but isn't
afraid of learning it. Dario, wkai or Lukas might know this better than me
though, I could be way out here.

-- 
Martin Sandsmark 
IT-Komiteen, Samfundet 
 “All models are wrong; Some are useful.”
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<