From kde-devel Tue Jun 10 23:38:23 2008 From: Matthew Woehlke Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:38:23 +0000 To: kde-devel Subject: Re: Fork of KDE4/Qt3? Message-Id: X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-devel&m=121314118822212 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On Monday 09 June 2008, James Richard Tyrer wrote: >> There is a general complaint here. Drag settings are not a substitute >> for a spin box and/or a radio. > > and why exactly? if the answer is, "because i'd like to achieve certain well > known 'good' sizes for icons" then the real answer is "then we provide > 'sticky' points during resize that correspond to those points". Some of us are just pixel-perfectionists that way :-). I'd bitch if kwin dropped showing the window geometry as well. (In fact, I wouldn't mind spinboxes to resize windows, though I understand that's a bit overkill and so don't expect anyone to implement it.) I was also going to mention something about exactly duplicating setups but didn't think it would be that compelling, but Parker made the point that is *is*... when you're trying to reproduce on the adjacent screen. -- Matthew This message will self destruct in five millennia. >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<