[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: ktempfile
From:       "Jos Poortvliet" <jospoortvliet () gmail ! com>
Date:       2007-10-16 19:16:37
Message-ID: 5c77e14b0710161216n5dcdd8e6h35cb33184237da31 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 10/16/07, Jaison Lee <lee.jaison@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/16/07, Jos Poortvliet <jospoortvliet@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Now I wonder - is this dangerous? And if not, would it be a good idea
> > to merge the patch?
>
> I'm assuming the patch does not disable KTempFile::sync and instead
> just removes the areas where konqi calls sync, yes? Can we see this
> patch?

Sorry, I forgot to add a link to the patch and discussion:

http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-4379798.html

> Konqi needing to call sync() is indeed a little suspicious. There
> aren't a lot of scenarios where that is necessary.

I do remeber some discussion some time ago about this, yes, but no
specifics come to mind ;-)
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]