On Tuesday 18 September 2007 07:59:23 am David Jarvie wrote: > On Tuesday 18 September 2007 14:12, Jos Poortvliet wrote: > > On 9/18/07, James Richard Tyrer wrote: > >> Robert Knight wrote: > >> > Hello James, > >> > > >> > I really do not think this is the best mailing list to discuss press > >> > feedback about the Linux desktop in general, especially when neither > >> > the article in question, nor your response deals with KDE directly. > >> > >> Are you the InterNet Police? :-D > > > > Na, I think he's kind'a right. Most of the things this guy complains > > about have to do with non-KDE issues, or at least, they are polish > > things someone needs to take care off - but I think most ppl are > > already aware of those. It's just that we need some ppl to take it up, > > and imho a distribution is the one who has to initiate it. It's mostly > > boring, needs to be paid for, I think. Either way, posting here won't > > help. > > I had the same reaction as Robert when I saw this posting. It really seems > too general an issue to post on a KDE development list. As Jos says, > people are probably aware that things need more polish. But to be relevant > to this list, it really needs to be more specific in pointing to WHAT > changes are needed in KDE. That, and I hate to say it, but most if not all the issues listed in the article were distribution related issues. -- Gary L. Greene, Jr. Sent from: peorth.tolharadys.net 08:08:17 up 9 days, 9:33, 1 user, load average: 0.19, 0.14, 0.06 ========================================================================= Developer and Project Lead for the AltimatOS open source project Volunteer Developer for the KDE open source project See www.tolharadys.net and www.kde.org for more information ========================================================================= Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<